Re: display offset along with block number in vacuum errors - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: display offset along with block number in vacuum errors
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoaPAYnWS1e1UuvDv0rBUSLpBqsmT_kGxuaq63dRFQrwoA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: display offset along with block number in vacuum errors  (Masahiko Sawada <masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 10:43 PM Masahiko Sawada
<masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> I think that since the user who uses this errcontext information is
> likely to know more or less the internal of PostgreSQL I think 0-based
> block number and 1-based offset will not be a problem. However, I
> expected these are documented but couldn't find. If not yet, I think
> it’s a good time to document that.

I agree. That's just how TIDs are.


--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dmitry Dolgov
Date:
Subject: Re: LSM tree for Postgres
Next
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: Can a background worker exist without shared memory access for EXEC_BACKEND cases?