On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 1:30 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I don't like this patch at all though; I do not think it is being nearly
> careful enough to ensure that it's matched the surviving relation OIDs
> correctly. In particular it blithely assumes that a zero in relid_map
> *must* match the immediately next entry in partdesc->oids, which is easy
> to break if the new partition is adjacent to the one the planner managed
> to prune. So I think we should do it more like the attached.
Ooh, nice catch.
> I'm strongly tempted to convert the trailing Assert to an actual
> test-and-elog, too, but didn't do so here.
I was thinking about that, too. +1 for taking that step.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
