Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

20 December 2018

• 00:29   Re: insensitive collations Peter Geoghegan
• 00:41   Re: insensitive collations Tom Lane
• 00:58   Re: lock level for DETACH PARTITION looks sketchy Robert Haas
• 01:07   Re: Ordered Partitioned Table Scans David Rowley
• 01:08   Re: Some memory allocations in gin fastupdate code are a bit brain dead David Rowley
• 01:28   Re: Why are we PageInit'ing buffers in RelationAddExtraBlocks()? Robert Haas
• 01:37   Re: Why are we PageInit'ing buffers in RelationAddExtraBlocks()? Andres Freund
• 01:41   Re: gist microvacuum doesn't appear to care about hot standby? Alexander Korotkov
• 01:51   RE: [PATCH] Fix Proposal - Deadlock Issue in Single User Mode When IOFailure Occurs Chengchao Yu
• 02:04   Re: Why are we PageInit'ing buffers in RelationAddExtraBlocks()? Robert Haas
• 02:14   Re: slow queries over information schema.tables Tom Lane
• 02:22   Re: GIN predicate locking slows down valgrind isolationteststremendously Andres Freund
• 02:22   A tidbit I spotted while playing in tablecmds.c Greg Stark
• 02:22   Re: [PATCH] Improve tab completion for CREATE TABLE ilmari@ilmari.org (Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker)
• 02:35   Re: Remove Deprecated Exclusive Backup Mode Michael Paquier
• 02:39   Re: [PATCH] Improve tab completion for CREATE TABLE ilmari@ilmari.org (Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker)
• 02:43   Re: A tidbit I spotted while playing in tablecmds.c Andres Freund
• 02:44   Re: [PATCH] Improve tab completion for CREATE TABLE Michael Paquier
• 03:02   Re: [PATCH] Improve tab completion for CREATE TABLE ilmari@ilmari.org (Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker)
• 03:39   Re: Why are we PageInit'ing buffers in RelationAddExtraBlocks()? Tom Lane
• 03:40   Re: Postgres Replication Issue Michael Paquier
• 03:42   Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables) John Naylor
• 03:54   Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables) Andrew Gierth
• 03:56   Re: Why are we PageInit'ing buffers in RelationAddExtraBlocks()? Andres Freund
• 04:01   Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writablevariables) Andres Freund
• 04:01   Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables) Tom Lane
• 04:05   Re: Tab completion for ALTER INDEX|TABLE ALTER COLUMN SET STATISTICS Tatsuro Yamada
• 04:38   Re: Tab completion for ALTER INDEX|TABLE ALTER COLUMN SET STATISTICS Michael Paquier
• 04:45   Re: [HACKERS] Macros bundling RELKIND_* conditions Michael Paquier
• 04:47   Re: Tab completion for ALTER INDEX|TABLE ALTER COLUMN SET STATISTICS Tatsuro Yamada
• 05:05   Re: A few new options for vacuumdb Michael Paquier
• 05:59   Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables) John Naylor
• 06:31   Re: slow queries over information schema.tables Pavel Stehule
• 06:44   Switching to 64-bit Bitmapsets David Rowley
• 07:26   RE: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries Ideriha, Takeshi
• 07:29   Re: slow queries over information schema.tables Tom Lane
• 07:50   Re: Switching to 64-bit Bitmapsets Tom Lane
• 08:20   Re: Ordered Partitioned Table Scans Julien Rouhaud
• 08:21   Re: slow queries over information schema.tables Pavel Stehule
• 08:24   Re: slow queries over information schema.tables Tom Lane
• 08:33   Re: [PATCH] Improve tab completion for CREATE TABLE Michael Paquier
• 08:53   Using POPCNT and other advanced bit manipulation instructions David Rowley
• 09:37   Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum Amit Kapila
• 09:44   Re: Switching to 64-bit Bitmapsets David Rowley
• 10:17   Re: Using POPCNT and other advanced bit manipulation instructions Gavin Flower
• 10:24   Re: [HACKERS] Restricting maximum keep segments by repslots Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
• 10:56   RE: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries Ideriha, Takeshi
• 11:10   Re: Using POPCNT and other advanced bit manipulation instructions David Rowley
• 11:17   RE: Localization tools for Postgres Ideriha, Takeshi
• 11:21   Improve selectivity estimate for range queries Yuzuko Hosoya
• 11:32   Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3? Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
• 13:29   Re: Remove Deprecated Exclusive Backup Mode David Steele
• 13:42   [patch] de.po REINDEX error Christoph Berg
• 13:57   Re: Using POPCNT and other advanced bit manipulation instructions Dmitry Dolgov
• 13:58   Re: Using POPCNT and other advanced bit manipulation instructions Jose Luis Tallon
• 14:49   Re: Tid scan improvements David Rowley
• 14:57   Re: Change pgarch_readyXlog() to return .history files first David Steele
• 15:13   Re: Add timeline to partial WAL segments David Steele
• 16:02   START/END line number for COPY FROM Surafel Temesgen
• 16:46   Re: Index Skip Scan Dmitry Dolgov
• 17:29   Re: lock level for DETACH PARTITION looks sketchy Alvaro Herrera
• 17:39   Re: insensitive collations Daniel Verite
• 18:19   Re: Online verification of checksums Michael Banck
• 19:48   Re: A few new options for vacuumdb Bossart, Nathan
• 19:59   Re: A case for UPDATE DISTINCT attribute Alexey Bashtanov
• 20:26   Re: Switching to 64-bit Bitmapsets Tom Lane
• 20:28   Re: lock level for DETACH PARTITION looks sketchy Robert Haas
• 20:44   Performance issue in foreign-key-aware join estimation Tom Lane
• 21:13   Re: lock level for DETACH PARTITION looks sketchy Alvaro Herrera
• 22:33   Re: Switching to 64-bit Bitmapsets David Rowley
• 22:45   Re: lock level for DETACH PARTITION looks sketchy Alvaro Herrera
• 23:43   Re: ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY Robert Haas
• 23:44   Re: lock level for DETACH PARTITION looks sketchy Robert Haas
• 23:56   Re: Add timeline to partial WAL segments Robert Haas
• 23:58   Re: ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY Alvaro Herrera
• 23:58   Re: lock level for DETACH PARTITION looks sketchy Alvaro Herrera
• 23:59   Re: lock level for DETACH PARTITION looks sketchy Robert Haas