On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 17:50, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > However, I doubt it would take much more effort to maintain
> > using 32-bit sets on 32-bit machines. If someone feels strongly about
> > that then I can adjust the patch to allow that.
>
> Hm, are you thinking of making BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD match sizeof(Pointer)
> or something like that? That seems like a good compromise from here.
Yeah, something along those lines. I've implemented that in the attached.
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
