Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)
Date
Msg-id 13958.1545267706@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)  (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk> writes:
> Is there any particular reason not to go further and use a perfect hash
> function for the lookup, rather than binary search?

Tooling?  I seem to recall having looked at gperf and deciding that it
pretty much sucked, so it's not real clear to me what we would use.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writablevariables)
Next
From: Tatsuro Yamada
Date:
Subject: Re: Tab completion for ALTER INDEX|TABLE ALTER COLUMN SET STATISTICS