Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

6 April 2018

• 00:19   Re: pgsql: New files for MERGE Andres Freund
• 00:27   Re: Excessive PostmasterIsAlive calls slow down WAL redo Andres Freund
• 00:33   Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data Tom Lane
• 00:37   Re: Flexible configuration for full-text search Andres Freund
• 00:39   Re: Excessive PostmasterIsAlive calls slow down WAL redo Tom Lane
• 01:01   Re: some last patches breaks plan cache Peter Eisentraut
• 01:10   Re: Parallel Aggregates for string_agg and array_agg Tels
• 01:11   Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Simon Riggs
• 01:20   Re: Excessive PostmasterIsAlive calls slow down WAL redo Andres Freund
• 01:25   Re: [HACKERS] Restrict concurrent update/delete with UPDATE ofpartition key Andres Freund
• 01:31   Re: SET TRANSACTION in PL/pgSQL Peter Eisentraut
• 01:33   Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS Bruce Momjian
• 01:34   Re: [HACKERS] Restrict concurrent update/delete with UPDATE ofpartition key Alvaro Herrera
• 01:43   Re: [HACKERS] Restrict concurrent update/delete with UPDATE ofpartition key Andres Freund
• 01:47   Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning Jesper Pedersen
• 02:00   Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Andres Freund
• 02:02   Re: Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem Heikki Linnakangas
• 02:02   Re: pgsql: New files for MERGE Bruce Momjian
• 02:06   Re: Online enabling of checksums Magnus Hagander
• 02:12   Re: Online enabling of checksums Andres Freund
• 02:14   Re: Online enabling of checksums Andres Freund
• 02:20   Re: Online enabling of checksums Magnus Hagander
• 02:27   Re: Online enabling of checksums Andres Freund
• 02:28   Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data John Naylor
• 02:29   Re: BUG #14941: Vacuum crashes Bossart, Nathan
• 02:29   Re: BUG #14941: Vacuum crashes Bossart, Nathan
• 02:35   Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data John Naylor
• 02:46   Re: Parallel Aggregates for string_agg and array_agg Tomas Vondra
• 02:47   Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data Tom Lane
• 02:49   Re: Parallel Aggregates for string_agg and array_agg Tomas Vondra
• 02:51   Re: Online enabling of checksums Joshua D. Drake
• 02:52   Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data Tom Lane
• 02:55   Re: file cloning in pg_upgrade and CREATE DATABASE Peter Eisentraut
• 03:01   Re: Online enabling of checksums Andres Freund
• 03:08   Re: Online enabling of checksums Joshua D. Drake
• 03:09   Re: Online enabling of checksums Peter Geoghegan
• 03:13   Re: Online enabling of checksums Magnus Hagander
• 03:13   Re: Online enabling of checksums Peter Geoghegan
• 03:16   Re: [HACKERS] Optional message to user when terminating/cancellingbackend Peter Eisentraut
• 03:23   Re: Online enabling of checksums Andres Freund
• 03:23   Re: [PATCH] btree_gin, add support for uuid, bool, name, bpchar andanyrange types Matheus de Oliveira
• 03:32   Re: Online enabling of checksums Magnus Hagander
• 03:33   Re: [HACKERS] Optional message to user when terminating/cancelling backend Daniel Gustafsson
• 03:41   Re: BUG #14941: Vacuum crashes Michael Paquier
• 03:41   Re: BUG #14941: Vacuum crashes Michael Paquier
• 03:41   Re: Online enabling of checksums Andres Freund
• 03:48   Re: Online enabling of checksums Tom Lane
• 03:50   Re: Online enabling of checksums Magnus Hagander
• 03:51   Re: Parallel Aggregates for string_agg and array_agg David Rowley
• 04:16   Checkpoint not retrying failed fsync? Andrew Gierth
• 04:35   Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning Alvaro Herrera
• 04:37   Re: Removing useless DISTINCT clauses David Rowley
• 04:46   Re: Fix for pg_stat_activity putting client hostaddr into appname field Edmund Horner
• 04:59   Re: Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem Claudio Freire
• 05:17   Re: Checkpoint not retrying failed fsync? Thomas Munro
• 05:33   Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning Alvaro Herrera
• 05:34   Re: Checkpoint not retrying failed fsync? Andrew Gierth
• 05:36   Re: Checkpoint not retrying failed fsync? Thomas Munro
• 05:37   Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS Andrew Gierth
• 05:43   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort Alexander Korotkov
• 06:02   Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning David Rowley
• 06:06   Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning David Rowley
• 06:28   Re: Online enabling of checksums Daniel Gustafsson
• 06:56   Re: Checkpoint not retrying failed fsync? Thomas Munro
• 07:11   Re: Checkpoint not retrying failed fsync? Thomas Munro
• 07:27   Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS Craig Ringer
• 07:29   Re: PATCH: psql tab completion for SELECT Peter Eisentraut
• 07:33   Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning Amit Langote
• 07:52   Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold. Masahiko Sawada
• 08:00   Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. Peter Geoghegan
• 08:03   Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning Amit Langote
• 08:39   Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning Amit Langote
• 08:47   Re: Fix for pg_stat_activity putting client hostaddr into appnamefield Michael Paquier
• 08:47   Re: BUG #14941: Vacuum crashes Michael Paquier
• 08:47   Re: BUG #14941: Vacuum crashes Michael Paquier
• 08:49   Re: [HACKERS] Optional message to user when terminating/cancellingbackend Michael Paquier
• 08:53   Re: chained transactions Peter Eisentraut
• 08:53   Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS Thomas Munro
• 08:54   Re: pgsql: New files for MERGE Michael Paquier
• 09:01   Re: PATCH: psql tab completion for SELECT Edmund Horner
• 09:08   Re: csv format for psql Peter Eisentraut
• 09:20   Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS Craig Ringer
• 09:27   Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning David Rowley
• 09:29   Re: using index or check in ALTER TABLE SET NOT NULL Peter Eisentraut
• 09:41   Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data Tom Lane
• 09:46   Re: csv format for psql Jonathan S. Katz
• 10:08   Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data John Naylor
• 10:11   Re: [HACKERS] Restrict concurrent update/delete with UPDATE ofpartition key Amit Kapila
• 10:31   Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Pavan Deolasee
• 10:47   Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data John Naylor
• 10:51   Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning Amit Langote
• 10:55   Re: PATCH: Configurable file mode mask Michael Paquier
• 11:08   Re: Excessive PostmasterIsAlive calls slow down WAL redo Michael Paquier
• 11:38   Re: csv format for psql Pavel Stehule
• 12:14   Re: some last patches breaks plan cache Pavel Stehule
• 12:19   Re: make installcheck-world in a clean environment Alexander Lakhin
• 12:21   Re: Optimizing nested ConvertRowtypeExpr execution Ashutosh Bapat
• 12:37   Re: [HACKERS] Restrict concurrent update/delete with UPDATE ofpartition key amul sul
• 12:37   Re: Optimizing nested ConvertRowtypeExpr execution Pavel Stehule
• 13:20   Re: [HACKERS] Restrict concurrent update/delete with UPDATE ofpartition key amul sul
• 13:28   Re: using index or check in ALTER TABLE SET NOT NULL Sergei Kornilov
• 13:37   Re: [HACKERS] Restrict concurrent update/delete with UPDATE ofpartition key amul sul
• 13:38   Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Amit Langote
• 13:49   Re: [HACKERS] Restrict concurrent update/delete with UPDATE ofpartition key Amit Kapila
• 13:51   Re: Flexible configuration for full-text search Aleksandr Parfenov
• 14:20   Re: Problem while setting the fpw with SIGHUP Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
• 14:21   Re: pgsql: New files for MERGE Simon Riggs
• 14:33   Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold. Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
• 14:38   AW: Get the name of the target Relation from Query struct? Ernst-Georg Schmid
• 14:49   Re: [HACKERS] Restrict concurrent update/delete with UPDATE ofpartition key amul sul
• 14:51   Re: Get the name of the target Relation from Query struct? David Rowley
• 15:06   AW: Get the name of the target Relation from Query struct? Ernst-Georg Schmid
• 15:11   AW: Get the name of the target Relation from Query struct? Ernst-Georg Schmid
• 15:18   Re: [HACKERS] Optional message to user when terminating/cancelling backend Daniel Gustafsson
• 15:25   Re: Online enabling of checksums Magnus Hagander
• 15:35   Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Simon Riggs
• 15:39   Re: Add support for printing/reading MergeAction nodes Simon Riggs
• 16:06   ERROR: invalid memory alloc request size 1073741824 Suhal Vemu
• 16:12   AW: Get the name of the target Relation from Query struct? SOLVED! Ernst-Georg Schmid
• 16:17   Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data John Naylor
• 16:46   Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning David Rowley
• 17:06   Re: ERROR: invalid memory alloc request size 1073741824 David Rowley
• 17:37   Re: pgsql: New files for MERGE Tom Kincaid
• 17:39   Re: Excessive PostmasterIsAlive calls slow down WAL redo Stephen Frost
• 17:52   Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Pavan Deolasee
• 18:00   Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions Andrew Dunstan
• 18:24   Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning Alvaro Herrera
• 18:29   Re: Problem while setting the fpw with SIGHUP Amit Kapila
• 18:30   Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions Peter Eisentraut
• 18:34   Re: Online enabling of checksums Tomas Vondra
• 18:43   Re: csv format for psql Jonathan S. Katz
• 19:03   Re: [FEATURE PATCH] pg_stat_statements with plans (v02) Julian Markwort
• 19:15   Re: PATCH: Configurable file mode mask Stephen Frost
• 19:23   Re: pgsql: New files for MERGE Pavan Deolasee
• 19:35   Re: Get the name of the target Relation from Query struct? Ashutosh Bapat
• 19:39   Re: Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem Heikki Linnakangas
• 19:40   Re: Get the name of the target Relation from Query struct? SOLVED! Ashutosh Bapat
• 19:42   Re: Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem Heikki Linnakangas
• 19:43   AW: Get the name of the target Relation from Query struct? SOLVED! Ernst-Georg Schmid
• 19:56   Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data John Naylor
• 20:00   Re: Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem Alvaro Herrera
• 20:04   Re: ERROR: invalid memory alloc request size 1073741824 Tom Lane
• 20:13   Re: pgsql: Foreign keys on partitioned tables Robert Haas
• 20:14   Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data Tom Lane
• 20:20   Re: PATCH: Configurable file mode mask Michael Paquier
• 20:25   Re: json(b)_to_tsvector with numeric values Teodor Sigaev
• 20:25   Re: [HACKERS] Subscription code improvements Peter Eisentraut
• 20:38   Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning Alvaro Herrera
• 20:39   Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data Tom Lane
• 20:40   Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning Alvaro Herrera
• 20:54   Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning Alvaro Herrera
• 21:36   Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning Amit Langote
• 21:41   Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning Amit Langote
• 21:46   Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning Alvaro Herrera
• 21:49   Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. Alexander Korotkov
• 21:51   Re: json(b)_to_tsvector with numeric values Dmitry Dolgov
• 22:04   Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data Tom Lane
• 22:20   Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions Andres Freund
• 22:22   Re: pgsql: New files for MERGE Bruce Momjian
• 22:22   Mop-up for the bootstrap data conversion patch Tom Lane
• 22:39   Re: Excessive PostmasterIsAlive calls slow down WAL redo Andres Freund
• 22:41   Re: Backend memory dump analysis Peter Eisentraut
• 22:41   Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning Alvaro Herrera
• 22:50   Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning Amit Langote
• 22:51   src/backend/partitioning Alvaro Herrera
• 22:55   Re: json(b)_to_tsvector with numeric values Teodor Sigaev
• 22:56   Re: pgsql: New files for MERGE Andres Freund
• 23:00   Re: Built-in connection pooling Konstantin Knizhnik
• 23:03   Re: Built-in connection pooling Konstantin Knizhnik
• 23:09   Re: Excessive PostmasterIsAlive calls slow down WAL redo Heikki Linnakangas
• 23:11   Re: Online enabling of checksums Andres Freund
• 23:20   Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. Teodor Sigaev
• 23:22   Re: Online enabling of checksums Andres Freund
• 23:22   Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. Peter Geoghegan
• 23:26   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort Tomas Vondra
• 23:33   Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. Alexander Korotkov
• 23:39   Re: pgsql: New files for MERGE Alexander Korotkov
• 23:40   Re: Online enabling of checksums Tomas Vondra
• 23:42   Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. Peter Geoghegan
• 23:43   Re: pgsql: New files for MERGE Andres Freund
• 23:45   Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning Jesper Pedersen
• 23:46   Re: Online enabling of checksums Andres Freund
• 23:57   Re: pgsql: New files for MERGE Peter Geoghegan
• 23:59   Re: Online enabling of checksums Tomas Vondra