Re: using index or check in ALTER TABLE SET NOT NULL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Sergei Kornilov
Subject Re: using index or check in ALTER TABLE SET NOT NULL
Date
Msg-id 3796271522999680@web16g.yandex.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: using index or check in ALTER TABLE SET NOT NULL  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hello, Peter!
I agree my patch seems as strange workaround. And better will be SET NOT NULL NOT VALID feature. But this change is
verycomplicated for me
 
For now my patch is small, simple and provides way for users.

regards, Sergei

06.04.2018, 06:29, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>:
> On 11/29/17 10:52, Sergei Kornilov wrote:
>>  My target problem of adding NOT NULL to big relation without long downtime can be done with ADD CONSTRAINT NOT
VALID,VALIDATE it in second transaction, then SET NOT NULL by my patch and drop unneeded constraint.
 
>
> It seems to me that this is a workaround for not properly cataloguing
> NOT NULL constraints. If we fixed that, you could do SET NOT NULL NOT
> VALID and go from there. Maybe we should look again into fixing that.
> That would solve so many problems.
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: amul sul
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Restrict concurrent update/delete with UPDATE ofpartition key
Next
From: amul sul
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Restrict concurrent update/delete with UPDATE ofpartition key