Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexander Korotkov
Subject Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.
Date
Msg-id CAPpHfdsORjuUoEbAi-maApOXsyQNrfy9SyZuzDbOMic3uT-CcQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. (the good and the bad)  (Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>)
Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 8:42 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 10:33 AM, Alexander Korotkov
<a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> Thinking about that again, I found that we should relax our requirements to
> "minus infinity" items, because pg_upgraded indexes doesn't have any
> special bits set for those items.
>
> What do you think about applying following patch on the top of v14?

It's clearly necessary. Looks fine to me.

OK, incorporated into v15.  I've also added sentence about pg_upgrade
to the commit message.

------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company 
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: Online enabling of checksums
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Online enabling of checksums