Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

1 April 2018

• 00:03   Re: [HACKERS][PATCH] adding simple sock check for windows Tom Lane
• 00:27   Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification Peter Geoghegan
• 00:28   Re: some last patches breaks plan cache Tomas Vondra
• 02:43   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort Tomas Vondra
• 03:06   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort Tomas Vondra
• 03:31   Re: [PROPOSAL] Shared Ispell dictionaries Arthur Zakirov
• 03:56   Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification Andres Freund
• 03:59   Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification Peter Geoghegan
• 04:15   Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification Peter Geoghegan
• 04:21   Re: Foreign keys and partitioned tables Alvaro Herrera
• 05:00   Re: some last patches breaks plan cache Tomas Vondra
• 05:56   Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification Peter Geoghegan
• 06:20   Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS Michael Paquier
• 06:31   Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. Peter Geoghegan
• 06:58   Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS Anthony Iliopoulos
• 07:14   Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS Anthony Iliopoulos
• 08:43   Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification Peter Geoghegan
• 09:08   Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification Andres Freund
• 09:09   Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification Peter Geoghegan
• 09:25   Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification Peter Geoghegan
• 09:29   Re: [HACKERS][PATCH] adding simple sock check for windows Amit Kapila
• 09:32   Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification Andres Freund
• 09:32   Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification Peter Geoghegan
• 09:39   Re: [HACKERS][PATCH] adding simple sock check for windows Amit Kapila
• 11:04   lazy detoasting Chapman Flack
• 11:04   Re: [HACKERS] why not parallel seq scan for slow functions Amit Kapila
• 11:19   Re: lazy detoasting Tom Lane
• 11:30   Re: [HACKERS][PATCH] adding simple sock check for windows Tom Lane
• 12:17   Re: [HACKERS] Removing [Merge]Append nodes which contain a single subpath David Rowley
• 12:30   Re: csv format for psql Fabien COELHO
• 13:26   Re: [HACKERS] Removing [Merge]Append nodes which contain a single subpath David Rowley
• 13:27   Re: csv format for psql Pavel Stehule
• 14:01   Re: some last patches breaks plan cache Pavel Stehule
• 14:14   tab complete for procedures for \sf and \ef commands Pavel Stehule
• 16:00   Re: hot_standby_feedback vs excludeVacuum and snapshots Simon Riggs
• 18:04   Re: Online enabling of checksums Magnus Hagander
• 18:48   Diagonal storage model Konstantin Knizhnik
• 18:51   Re: new function for tsquery creartion Aleksandr Parfenov
• 19:39   Re: Add default role 'pg_access_server_files' Stephen Frost
• 20:51   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Improve OR conditions on joined columns (commonstar schema problem) David Rowley
• 20:54   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Improve OR conditions on joined columns (commonstar schema problem) David Rowley
• 21:10   json(b)_to_tsvector with numeric values Dmitry Dolgov
• 21:11   Re: Diagonal storage model Дмитрий Воронин
• 21:27   Re: [PATCH] Verify Checksums during Basebackups Magnus Hagander
• 21:46   Re: [PATCH] pg_hba.conf : new auth option : clientcert=verify-full Magnus Hagander
• 22:01   Re: [PATCH] pg_hba.conf : new auth option : clientcert=verify-full Julian Markwort
• 22:07   Re: [PATCH] pg_hba.conf : new auth option : clientcert=verify-full Magnus Hagander
• 22:07   Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: multivariate histograms and MCV lists Tomas Vondra
• 22:33   Re: Planning counters in pg_stat_statements legrand legrand
• 22:43   Re: Diagonal storage model legrand legrand
• 23:09   Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. Alexander Korotkov
• 23:13   Re: Diagonal storage model Alexander Korotkov
• 23:32   Re: Optimize Arm64 crc32c implementation in Postgresql Andres Freund
• 23:38   Rethinking -L switch handling and construction of LDFLAGS Tom Lane
• 23:43   Re: Rethinking -L switch handling and construction of LDFLAGS Andres Freund
• 23:53   Re: [HACKERS] Lazy hash table for XidInMVCCSnapshot (helps Zipfian abit) Yura Sokolov
• 23:55   Re: Rethinking -L switch handling and construction of LDFLAGS Tom Lane
• 23:58   Re: [HACKERS] Lazy hash table for XidInMVCCSnapshot (helps Zipfian abit) Yura Sokolov