Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification
Date
Msg-id CAH2-Wzn76eCGUonARy-wrVtMHsf+4cvbK_oJAWTLfORTU5ki0w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 3:15 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 2:59 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
>> WFM. I have all the information I need to produce the next revision now.
>
> I might as well post this one first. I'll have 0002 for you in a short while.

Looks like thrips doesn't like this, though other Windows buildfarm
animals are okay with it.

round() is from C99, apparently. I'll investigate a fix.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Anthony Iliopoulos
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification