Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification
Date
Msg-id 20180401030831.vfzfo3cnsfkm4yas@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2018-03-31 19:43:45 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 3:15 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 2:59 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> >> WFM. I have all the information I need to produce the next revision now.
> >
> > I might as well post this one first. I'll have 0002 for you in a short while.
> 
> Looks like thrips doesn't like this, though other Windows buildfarm
> animals are okay with it.
> 
> round() is from C99, apparently. I'll investigate a fix.

Just replacing it with a floor(val + 0.5) ought to do the trick, right?

Greetings,

Andres Freund


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification