Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

27 September 2017

• 00:26   [HACKERS] User-perspective knowledge about wait events Schneider
• 00:37   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use? Tom Lane
• 00:38   Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables inVACUUM commands Bossart, Nathan
• 00:59   [HACKERS] v10 pg_ctl compatibility Jeff Janes
• 01:14   Re: [HACKERS] Row Level Security Documentation Dean Rasheed
• 01:29   Re: [HACKERS] Row Level Security Documentation Stephen Frost
• 01:29   Re: [HACKERS] v10 pg_ctl compatibility Andres Freund
• 01:33   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use? Andrew Dunstan
• 01:40   Re: [HACKERS] v10 pg_ctl compatibility Tom Lane
• 01:42   Re: [HACKERS] v10 pg_ctl compatibility Andres Freund
• 02:00   Re: [HACKERS] v10 pg_ctl compatibility Jeff Janes
• 02:03   [HACKERS] Re: Patch to address concerns about ICU collcollate stability in v10(Was: CREATE COLLATION does not sanitize ICU's BCP 47 language tags. Should it?) Peter Geoghegan
• 02:07   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use? Tom Lane
• 02:10   Re: [HACKERS] v10 pg_ctl compatibility Tom Lane
• 02:25   Re: [HACKERS][BUG] Cache invalidation for queries that contains constof temporary composite type Maksim Milyutin
• 03:04   Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning David Rowley
• 03:14   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use? Bruce Momjian
• 03:32   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use? Tom Lane
• 03:41   [HACKERS] Multicolumn hash indexes Tomasz Ostrowski
• 03:45   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use? Stephen Frost
• 03:46   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use? Bruce Momjian
• 04:04   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use? Andrew Dunstan
• 04:15   Re: [HACKERS] v10 pg_ctl compatibility Jeff Janes
• 04:18   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use? Andrew Dunstan
• 04:25   Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication - test_decoding - unchanged-toast-datum Euler Taveira
• 04:36   Re: [HACKERS] v10 pg_ctl compatibility Andres Freund
• 04:39   Re: [HACKERS] md5 still listed as an option in pg_hba.conf.sample Michael Paquier
• 04:49   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use? Tom Lane
• 04:54   Re: [HACKERS] v10 pg_ctl compatibility Tom Lane
• 05:01   Re: [HACKERS] v10 pg_ctl compatibility Andres Freund
• 05:05   Re: [HACKERS] v10 pg_ctl compatibility Jeff Janes
• 05:18   Re: [HACKERS] Multicolumn hash indexes Tom Lane
• 05:21   Re: [HACKERS] Multicolumn hash indexes Robert Haas
• 05:28   Re: [HACKERS] User-perspective knowledge about wait events Michael Paquier
• 05:31   Re: [HACKERS] v10 pg_ctl compatibility Tom Lane
• 06:11   Re: [HACKERS] Multicolumn hash indexes Robert Haas
• 06:39   Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning Amit Langote
• 06:46   Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication - test_decoding - unchanged-toast-datum Abhinav Singh
• 07:22   Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning Amit Langote
• 08:28   [HACKERS] Use of RangeVar for partitioned tables in autovacuum Michael Paquier
• 09:20   Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw: evaluate placeholdervars on remote server Etsuro Fujita
• 09:32   Re: [HACKERS] Multicolumn hash indexes Tom Lane
• 11:03   Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning Amit Langote
• 11:30   Re: [HACKERS] v10 pg_ctl compatibility Jeff Janes
• 11:52   Re: [HACKERS] coverage analysis improvements Michael Paquier
• 12:20   Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning amul sul
• 12:41   Re: [HACKERS] Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers Masahiko Sawada
• 13:05   Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning amul sul
• 13:05   Re: [HACKERS] Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers Ashutosh Bapat
• 13:06   Re: [HACKERS] The case for removing replacement selection sort Simon Riggs
• 13:07   Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes Simon Riggs
• 13:29   Re: [HACKERS] The case for removing replacement selection sort Peter Geoghegan
• 14:45   Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification Michael Paquier
• 14:58   Re: [HACKERS] pg_stat_wal_write statistics view Haribabu Kommi
• 15:05   Re: [HACKERS] Enhancements to passwordcheck Albe Laurenz
• 16:05   [HACKERS] ALTER enums (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: doc: first draft ofPostgres 10 release notes) Alvaro Herrera
• 16:12   Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise aggregation/grouping Jeevan Chalke
• 16:12   Re: [HACKERS] Transactions involving multiple postgres foreignservers Stas Kelvich
• 16:41   [HACKERS] Float value 'Infinity' is cast to numeric 1 on Windows Taiki Kondo
• 16:48   Re: [HACKERS] Enhancements to passwordcheck Michael Paquier
• 16:52   [HACKERS] 200 = 199 + 1? Marko Tiikkaja
• 17:06   Re: [HACKERS] Float value 'Infinity' is cast to numeric 1 on Windows Kohei KaiGai
• 17:07   [HACKERS] Restrict concurrent update/delete with UPDATE of partition key amul sul
• 17:28   Re: [HACKERS] Walsender timeouts and large transactions Sokolov Yura
• 17:46   Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions Stas Kelvich
• 17:59   Re: [HACKERS] Binary search in fmgr_isbuiltin() is a bottleneck. tushar
• 18:05   Re: [HACKERS] Pluggable storage Alexander Korotkov
• 18:08   Re: [HACKERS] Pluggable storage Alexander Korotkov
• 18:24   Re: [HACKERS] logical replication and statistics Pavel Stehule
• 18:40   Re: [HACKERS] Enhancements to passwordcheck Peter Eisentraut
• 18:41   Re: [HACKERS] md5 still listed as an option in pg_hba.conf.sample Peter Eisentraut
• 18:50   [HACKERS] Re: ALTER enums (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: doc: first draft ofPostgres 10 release notes) Andrew Dunstan
• 19:11   [HACKERS] Re: ALTER enums (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: doc: first draft ofPostgres 10 release notes) Alvaro Herrera
• 19:19   Re: [HACKERS] Multicolumn hash indexes David Fetter
• 19:41   Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning Jesper Pedersen
• 19:56   Re: [HACKERS] Multicolumn hash indexes Jesper Pedersen
• 20:10   Re: [HACKERS] Create replication slot in pg_basebackup if requestedand not yet present Peter Eisentraut
• 20:28   Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication - test_decoding - unchanged-toast-datum Euler Taveira
• 20:39   Re: [BUGS] [HACKERS] Float value 'Infinity' is cast to numeric 1 on Windows Tom Lane
• 20:43   Re: [HACKERS] Enhancements to passwordcheck Bossart, Nathan
• 21:06   Re: [HACKERS] Enhancements to passwordcheck Alvaro Herrera
• 21:18   Re: [HACKERS] Binary search in fmgr_isbuiltin() is a bottleneck. Robert Haas
• 21:30   Re: [HACKERS] Binary search in fmgr_isbuiltin() is a bottleneck. Robert Haas
• 21:32   Re: [HACKERS] Multicolumn hash indexes Robert Haas
• 21:33   Re: [HACKERS] Multicolumn hash indexes Nico Williams
• 21:34   Re: [HACKERS] Multicolumn hash indexes Robert Haas
• 21:44   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Improve geometric types Emre Hasegeli
• 21:45   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Improve geometric types Emre Hasegeli
• 21:45   Re: [HACKERS] 200 = 199 + 1? Tom Lane
• 21:50   Re: [HACKERS] Binary search in fmgr_isbuiltin() is a bottleneck. Tom Lane
• 21:57   Re: [HACKERS] Multicolumn hash indexes Tom Lane
• 21:59   Re: [HACKERS] Multicolumn hash indexes Robert Haas
• 22:20   Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables inVACUUM commands Bossart, Nathan
• 22:51   Re: [HACKERS] Pluggable storage Alexander Korotkov
• 23:00   Re: [HACKERS] Binary search in fmgr_isbuiltin() is a bottleneck. Andres Freund
• 23:15   Re: [HACKERS] Create replication slot in pg_basebackup if requestedand not yet present Michael Banck
• 23:20   Re: [HACKERS] SendRowDescriptionMessage() is slow for queries with alot of columns Andres Freund
• 23:28   Re: [HACKERS] Binary search in fmgr_isbuiltin() is a bottleneck. Robert Haas
• 23:29   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH]make pg_rewind to not copy useless WAL files Alexander Korotkov
• 23:38   Re: [HACKERS] WIP: Separate log file for extension Antonin Houska
• 23:40   Re: [HACKERS] Binary search in fmgr_isbuiltin() is a bottleneck. Andres Freund
• 23:46   Re: [HACKERS] Binary search in fmgr_isbuiltin() is a bottleneck. Tom Lane