Re: [HACKERS] Binary search in fmgr_isbuiltin() is a bottleneck. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From tushar
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Binary search in fmgr_isbuiltin() is a bottleneck.
Date
Msg-id a23a4d7d-ad60-8ce1-948a-9c4458441241@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] Binary search in fmgr_isbuiltin() is a bottleneck.  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Binary search in fmgr_isbuiltin() is a bottleneck.
List pgsql-hackers
On 09/14/2017 12:21 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Surprising myself I discovered that in workloads that do a large number
> of fmgr_info* lookups, fmgr_isbuiltin() is actually quite the
> bottleneck.
>
After discussion with Jeevan Ladhe, we created a sql query which contain 
lots of inbuild function and tested that against pgbench    with  master 
v/s patch and found an improvement

Virtual Machine configuration - Centos 6.5 x64 / 16 GB RAM / 8 VCPU core 
processor


pgbench -c 8 -j 8 -f /tmy/mytest.sql  -T 300 postgres

PG Head             -   tps = 5309.810807 (excluding connections 
establishing).
PG HEAD+patch -  tps =  5751.745767(8.32+% vs. head)


pgbench -c 8 -j 8 -f /tmp/mytest.sql   -T 500 postgres

PG Head             -  tps = 7701.176220(excluding connections 
establishing).
PG HEAD+patch -  tps = 7953.934043(3.27+% vs. head)

-- 
regards,tushar
EnterpriseDB  https://www.enterprisedb.com/
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stas Kelvich
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Next
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Pluggable storage