Re: [HACKERS] Pluggable storage - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexander Korotkov
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Pluggable storage
Date
Msg-id CAPpHfdsWWTtj4e3+QEpQ1Ta1ocB-g+GV2Ni+LcL3nrv5b9O-qA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Pluggable storage  (Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 8:26 AM, Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com> wrote:
- Minor: don't think the _function suffix for Storis necessary, just
  makes things long, and every member has it. Besides that, it's also
  easy to misunderstand - for a second I understood
  scan_getnext_function to be about getting the next function...

OK. How about adding _hook?

I've answered to Andrew why I think _function suffix is OK for now.
And I don't particularly like _hook suffix for this purpose, because those functions are parts of API implementation, not hooks.

------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Pluggable storage
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] logical replication and statistics