Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2017-09-27 13:46:50 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The other question that ought to be answered is whether a gperf hash
>> table would be faster.
> Ugh, hacking together a quick input file for gperf, I'm *far* from
> convinced. The generated code does multiple lookups in significantly
> sized arrays, and assumes string input. The latter seems like a complete
> dealbreaker, and there doesn't seem to be an option to turn it off.
Ugh. I'd never actually used gperf, and now I know why not ;-)
However, that's just the first tool that came to mind. Wikipedia's
article on perfect hashes links to our man Jenkins:
http://burtleburtle.net/bob/hash/perfect.html
which looks pretty promising.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
