Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

24 May 2016

• 00:07   Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14153: Unrecognized node type error when upsert is present in recursive CTE Peter Geoghegan
• 00:13   BTREE_BUILD_STATS build is broken Peter Geoghegan
• 00:20   Re: Calling json_* functions with JSONB data Peter van Hardenberg
• 00:22   Re: Calling json_* functions with JSONB data David G. Johnston
• 00:37   Re: Changed SRF in targetlist handling David G. Johnston
• 00:38   Re: Calling json_* functions with JSONB data Jim Nasby
• 00:45   Re: Calling json_* functions with JSONB data David G. Johnston
• 00:53   Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14153: Unrecognized node type error when upsert is present in recursive CTE Tom Lane
• 00:55   Re: Inheritance Jim Nasby
• 00:58   Re: Changed SRF in targetlist handling Joe Conway
• 01:05   Re: Inheritance Tom Lane
• 01:18   Re: Inheritance Joe Conway
• 01:26   Re: Inheritance Tom Lane
• 01:31   Re: Inheritance Alvaro Herrera
• 02:11   Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14153: Unrecognized node type error when upsert is present in recursive CTE Tom Lane
• 02:15   Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14153: Unrecognized node type error when upsert is present in recursive CTE Peter Geoghegan
• 02:27   Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14153: Unrecognized node type error when upsert is present in recursive CTE Tom Lane
• 02:33   Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14153: Unrecognized node type error when upsert is present in recursive CTE Peter Geoghegan
• 02:41   Re: BTREE_BUILD_STATS build is broken Tom Lane
• 03:05   Re: Typo in 001_initdb.pl Tom Lane
• 04:12   LSN as a recovery target Michael Paquier
• 04:12   Re: BTREE_BUILD_STATS build is broken Peter Geoghegan
• 04:18   Re: Typo in 001_initdb.pl Michael Paquier
• 04:20   Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq Craig Ringer
• 04:25   Re: LSN as a recovery target Craig Ringer
• 04:27   Re: Typo in 001_initdb.pl Stephen Frost
• 05:01   Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq Craig Ringer
• 06:09   Re: BTREE_BUILD_STATS build is broken Tom Lane
• 06:30   Re: Inheritance Craig Ringer
• 06:40   Re: BTREE_BUILD_STATS build is broken Peter Geoghegan
• 07:02   Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq Craig Ringer
• 07:28   Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq Tom Lane
• 07:29   Re: LSN as a recovery target Michael Paquier
• 09:03   Is the unfair lwlock behavior intended? Tsunakawa, Takayuki
• 13:30   Re: Is the unfair lwlock behavior intended? Alexander Korotkov
• 14:27   pg_dump -j against standbys Magnus Hagander
• 14:46   [PATCH] add missing "USING bloom" into bloom extension documentation Nikolay Shaplov
• 15:29   Re: [PATCH] add missing "USING bloom" into bloom extension documentation Teodor Sigaev
• 15:33   Re: [sqlsmith] Failed assertions on parallel worker shutdown Amit Kapila
• 16:06   Re: [sqlsmith] Failed assertions on parallel worker shutdown Andreas Seltenreich
• 16:53   Re: Inheritance Jim Nasby
• 16:55   Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq Jim Nasby
• 17:03   Re: pg_dump -j against standbys Jim Nasby
• 17:07   [PROPOSAL][PROTOTYPE] Individual options for each index column: Opclass options Nikolay Shaplov
• 17:09   Re: Calling json_* functions with JSONB data Jim Nasby
• 17:12   [PROPOSAL] Move all am-related reloption code into src/backend/access/[am-name] and get rid of relopt_kind Nikolay Shaplov
• 17:26   Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0 Jim Nasby
• 17:31   Re: BTREE_BUILD_STATS build is broken Tom Lane
• 17:45   Re: Inheritance Konstantin Knizhnik
• 18:39   Re: pg_dump -j against standbys Tom Lane
• 19:14   Re: LSN as a recovery target Christoph Berg
• 19:24   Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold < Kevin Grittner
• 19:29   Re: LSN as a recovery target Alvaro Herrera
• 19:32   Re: LSN as a recovery target Michael Paquier
• 19:40   Re: pg_dump -j against standbys Michael Paquier
• 19:47   Re: [PATCH][Documination] Add optional USING keyword before opclass name in INSERT statemet Tom Lane
• 20:01   Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold < Andres Freund
• 20:30   Windows 7/8, Visual Studio 2013: Runtime error r6034 microsoft visual c++ runtime library(pgadmin3.exe) zeray87
• 21:04   Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold < Kevin Grittner
• 21:09   effective_io_concurrency in 9.6beta Jeff Janes
• 21:11   Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold < Alvaro Herrera
• 21:12   Allow COPY to use parameters David Fetter
• 21:12   Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold < Tom Lane
• 21:13   Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold < Andres Freund
• 21:16   Re: Allow COPY to use parameters Tom Lane
• 21:28   Re: effective_io_concurrency in 9.6beta Tom Lane
• 21:34   Re: effective_io_concurrency in 9.6beta Alvaro Herrera
• 22:01   Re: Autovacuum to prevent wraparound tries to consume xid Tom Lane
• 22:33   Speaking of breaking compatibility...standard_conforming_strings David G. Johnston
• 22:36   Re: Bug in intarray bench script Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum
• 22:48   Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold < Kevin Grittner
• 22:57   Re: Speaking of breaking compatibility...standard_conforming_strings Tom Lane
• 23:01   Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold < Alvaro Herrera
• 23:07   Re: Speaking of breaking compatibility...standard_conforming_strings David G. Johnston
• 23:38   Re: Is the unfair lwlock behavior intended? Ants Aasma
• 23:39   Re: Is the unfair lwlock behavior intended? Ants Aasma
• 23:42   Re: Allow COPY to use parameters David Fetter
• 23:55   Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold < Andres Freund
• 23:55   Re: Allow COPY to use parameters Merlin Moncure