Re: effective_io_concurrency in 9.6beta - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: effective_io_concurrency in 9.6beta
Date
Msg-id 20160524183438.GA443623@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: effective_io_concurrency in 9.6beta  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: effective_io_concurrency in 9.6beta  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> writes:
> > commit 1aba62ec made zero be an illegal value for effective_io_concurrency.
> > i think this was an accident.  If not, then the sample postgresql.conf
> > (at least) needs to be updated.
> 
> It looks like the problem is that the new range check
> 
> +   /* This range check shouldn't fail, but let's be paranoid */
> +   return (new_prefetch_pages > 0.0 && new_prefetch_pages < (double) INT_MAX);
> 
> should be testing for >= 0.0 not > 0.0.

Hmm, yeah, it looks like that's it.  Will fix.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: effective_io_concurrency in 9.6beta
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Autovacuum to prevent wraparound tries to consume xid