Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

15 July 2015

• 00:22   Re: ctidscan as an example of custom-scan (Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API) Robert Haas
• 00:31   Re: pg_trgm version 1.2 Jeff Janes
• 00:57   Re: patch : Allow toast tables to be moved to a different tablespace Jim Nasby
• 01:04   Re: ctidscan as an example of custom-scan (Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API) Tom Lane
• 01:21   Re: Implementation of global temporary tables? Jim Nasby
• 03:35   Re: optimizing vacuum truncation scans Haribabu Kommi
• 03:49   Re: ctidscan as an example of custom-scan (Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API) Kouhei Kaigai
• 04:12   Re: ctidscan as an example of custom-scan (Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API) Kouhei Kaigai
• 04:14   Re: Memory Accounting v11 Tomas Vondra
• 04:36   Re: security labels on databases are bad for dump & restore Kouhei Kaigai
• 06:43   Re: security labels on databases are bad for dump & restore Ted Toth
• 07:07   Re: creating extension including dependencies Michael Paquier
• 07:10   Re: security labels on databases are bad for dump & restore Kouhei Kaigai
• 07:59   Re: TABLESAMPLE patch is really in pretty sad shape Noah Misch
• 08:12   Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 Beena Emerson
• 08:38   Re: TABLESAMPLE patch is really in pretty sad shape Simon Riggs
• 08:50   Re: assessing parallel-safety Amit Kapila
• 09:29   Re: ctidscan as an example of custom-scan (Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API) Michael Paquier
• 09:30   Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 Amit Kapila
• 09:53   Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 Simon Riggs
• 09:59   Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 Simon Riggs
• 10:01   Re: Could be improved point of UPSERT Yourfriend
• 10:01   Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 Simon Riggs
• 10:08   Re: ctidscan as an example of custom-scan (Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API) Kouhei Kaigai
• 10:18   Re: [DESIGN] Incremental checksums Amit Kapila
• 10:23   Re: Could be improved point of UPSERT Peter Geoghegan
• 10:27   Re: Memory Accounting v11 Jeff Davis
• 10:29   Re: Memory Accounting v11 Atri Sharma
• 11:10   Re: Could be improved point of UPSERT Yourfriend
• 11:18   Re: security labels on databases are bad for dump & restore Andres Freund
• 11:24   Re: [DESIGN] Incremental checksums Andres Freund
• 11:44   Re: Parallel Seq Scan Antonin Houska
• 12:03   Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 Michael Paquier
• 12:04   Re: security labels on databases are bad for dump & restore Alvaro Herrera
• 12:08   Re: security labels on databases are bad for dump & restore Andres Freund
• 13:39   Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 Simon Riggs
• 14:25   Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 Alvaro Herrera
• 14:39   Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 Simon Riggs
• 14:58   Re: Implementation of global temporary tables? Simon Riggs
• 15:26   Re: Implementation of global temporary tables? Andrew Dunstan
• 15:41   Re: Implementation of global temporary tables? Pavel Stehule
• 16:19   Re: optimizing vacuum truncation scans Amit Kapila
• 16:30   Re: Implementation of global temporary tables? Pavel Stehule
• 16:41   Grouping Sets: Fix unrecognized node type bug Jeevan Chalke
• 17:05   Re: Implementation of global temporary tables? Simon Riggs
• 17:14   Re: Making ParameterStatus available for more parameter types? Robert Haas
• 17:25   Re: Implementation of global temporary tables? Pavel Stehule
• 17:52   Re: [PATCH] Generalized JSON output functions Robert Haas
• 17:52   Re: Implementation of global temporary tables? Andres Freund
• 17:57   Re: Implementation of global temporary tables? Andres Freund
• 18:01   Re: First Aggregate Funtion? Robert Haas
• 18:24   Re: Implementation of global temporary tables? Zhaomo Yang
• 18:24   Re: Implementation of global temporary tables? Zhaomo Yang
• 18:24   Re: Implementation of global temporary tables? Simon Riggs
• 18:28   Re: Implementation of global temporary tables? Andres Freund
• 18:36   Re: Implementation of global temporary tables? Simon Riggs
• 18:40   Re: Implementation of global temporary tables? Tom Lane
• 18:41   Re: Implementation of global temporary tables? Tom Lane
• 18:43   Re: [DESIGN] Incremental checksums David Christensen
• 18:44   Re: LWLock deadlock and gdb advice Heikki Linnakangas
• 18:44   Re: Implementation of global temporary tables? Andres Freund
• 18:53   Re: Implementation of global temporary tables? Simon Riggs
• 19:20   Re: ctidscan as an example of custom-scan (Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API) Robert Haas
• 19:29   Re: ctidscan as an example of custom-scan (Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API) Robert Haas
• 19:51   Re: Grouping Sets: Fix unrecognized node type bug Andrew Gierth
• 19:52   Retrieve the snapshot's LSN Florent Guiliani
• 19:58   Re: [PATCH] Generalized JSON output functions Andrew Dunstan
• 20:06   Re: Memory Accounting v11 Jeff Davis
• 20:10   Re: [PATCH] Generalized JSON output functions Ryan Pedela
• 20:20   Re: [PATCH] Generalized JSON output functions Ryan Pedela
• 21:43   [PATCH] postgres_fdw extension support Paul Ramsey
• 22:22   Re: Memory Accounting v11 Robert Haas
• 22:23   Re: Memory Accounting v11 Robert Haas
• 22:30   Re: patch : Allow toast tables to be moved to a different tablespace Robert Haas
• 23:18   Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker. Rahila Syed
• 23:32   Re: assessing parallel-safety Robert Haas