Re: security labels on databases are bad for dump & restore - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: security labels on databases are bad for dump & restore
Date
Msg-id 20150715081840.GC5520@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: security labels on databases are bad for dump & restore  (Adam Brightwell <adam.brightwell@crunchydatasolutions.com>)
Responses Re: security labels on databases are bad for dump & restore
List pgsql-hackers
On 2015-07-14 13:09:26 -0400, Adam Brightwell wrote:
> All,
> 
> >> I won't have time to do anything about this anytime soon, but I think we
> >> should fix that at some point.  Shall I put this on the todo? Or do we
> >> want to create an 'open items' page that's not major version specific?
> >
> > I think adding it to the TODO would be great.

Done. It's rather telling that it took me a fair while to find a spot in
the todo list where it fits...

> I'd be willing to look/dive into this one further.

Cool.


One thing worth mentioning is that arguably the problem is caused by the
fact that we're here emitting database level information in pg_dump,
normally only done for dumpall.

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Yourfriend
Date:
Subject: Re: Could be improved point of UPSERT
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [DESIGN] Incremental checksums