Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Date
Msg-id CANP8+jJnjPqtiCqyDkHawcmm-j=3SPYKqdpCrchhy83fnwwSkg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 29 June 2015 at 18:40, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
  
I'm in favor of a more robust and sophisticated synch rep.  But not if
nobody not on this mailing list can configure it, and not if even we
don't know what it will do in an actual failure situation.

That's the key point. Editing the config after a failure is a Failure of Best Practice in an HA system.

--
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Yourfriend
Date:
Subject: Re: Could be improved point of UPSERT
Next
From: Kouhei Kaigai
Date:
Subject: Re: ctidscan as an example of custom-scan (Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API)