Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

28 October 2013

• 04:51   Re: CLUSTER FREEZE Craig Ringer
• 06:34   Re: dsm use of uint64 Noah Misch
• 08:27   PostgreSQL Service on Windows does not start. ~ "is not a valid Win32 application" Naoya Anzai
• 09:00   Re: PostgreSQL Service on Windows does not start. ~ "is not a valid Win32 application" Asif Naeem
• 10:00   Re: Example query causing param_info to be set in plain rel path Ashutosh Bapat
• 10:07   Re: PostgreSQL Service on Windows does not start. ~ "is not a valid Win32 application" Naoya Anzai
• 11:13   Re: Detection of nested function calls Hugo Mercier
• 11:19   Re: PostgreSQL Service on Windows does not start. ~ "is not a valid Win32 application" Asif Naeem
• 11:39   Re: Detection of nested function calls Andres Freund
• 12:10   Re: Document update in alter_foreign_data_wrapper.sgml Etsuro Fujita
• 12:13   Re: Detection of nested function calls Pavel Stehule
• 12:24   Re: PostgreSQL Service on Windows does not start. ~ "is not a valid Win32 application" Dave Page
• 12:24   Re: Detection of nested function calls Andres Freund
• 12:30   Re: Detection of nested function calls Hugo Mercier
• 12:34   Re: Detection of nested function calls Andres Freund
• 12:53   Re: ERROR : 'tuple concurrently updated' Stéphan BEUZE
• 13:30   Re: Detection of nested function calls Pavel Stehule
• 14:46   Re: PostgreSQL Service on Windows does not start. ~ "is not a valid Win32 application" Sandeep Thakkar
• 16:04   Re: ERROR : 'tuple concurrently updated' Amit Kapila
• 17:30   Re: Document update in alter_foreign_data_wrapper.sgml Tom Lane
• 18:12   Re: Detection of nested function calls Tom Lane
• 18:54   Re: logical changeset generation v6.2 Robert Haas
• 19:04   Re: logical changeset generation v6.2 Robert Haas
• 19:04   Re: Re: Using indexes for ORDER BY and PARTITION BY clause in windowing functions Sameer Kumar
• 19:07   Re: RULE regression test fragility? Robert Haas
• 19:08   Re: PL/Python: domain over array support Robert Haas
• 19:11   Re: RULE regression test fragility? Tom Lane
• 19:11   OSX doesn't accept identical source/target for strcpy() anymore Andres Freund
• 19:17   Re: dsm use of uint64 Robert Haas
• 19:17   Re: logical changeset generation v6.2 Andres Freund
• 19:23   Re: RULE regression test fragility? Robert Haas
• 19:28   Re: logical changeset generation v6.2 Robert Haas
• 19:28   Re: OSX doesn't accept identical source/target for strcpy() anymore Tom Lane
• 19:31   Re: OSX doesn't accept identical source/target for strcpy() anymore Robert Haas
• 19:33   Re: Detection of nested function calls Robert Haas
• 19:35   Re: RULE regression test fragility? Tom Lane
• 19:42   Re: Detection of nested function calls Tom Lane
• 19:49   Re: Detection of nested function calls Andres Freund
• 20:41   Re: Detection of nested function calls Tom Lane
• 20:43   Re: Detection of nested function calls ktm@rice.edu
• 20:55   Re: RULE regression test fragility? Robert Haas
• 21:05   Re: Detection of nested function calls Andres Freund
• 21:10   Re: better atomics Robert Haas
• 21:11   Re: OSX doesn't accept identical source/target for strcpy() anymore Tom Lane
• 21:19   Re: better atomics Andres Freund
• 21:26   Re: Detection of nested function calls Tom Lane
• 21:27   Re: OSX doesn't accept identical source/target for strcpy() anymore Andres Freund
• 21:44   Re: OSX doesn't accept identical source/target for strcpy() anymore didier
• 22:02   Re: better atomics Robert Haas
• 22:11   Re: Detection of nested function calls Andres Freund
• 22:16   Re: PL/Python: domain over array support Rodolfo Campero
• 22:20   Re: OSX doesn't accept identical source/target for strcpy() anymore Andrew Dunstan
• 22:32   Re: better atomics Andres Freund
• 22:46   Re: OSX doesn't accept identical source/target for strcpy() anymore Andres Freund
• 22:58   Re: better atomics Robert Haas
• 23:02   Re: OSX doesn't accept identical source/target for strcpy() anymore Tom Lane
• 23:03   Re: better atomics Heikki Linnakangas
• 23:07   Re: better atomics Tom Lane
• 23:11   Re: OSX doesn't accept identical source/target for strcpy() anymore Peter Geoghegan
• 23:14   Re: Detection of nested function calls Tom Lane
• 23:22   Re: better atomics Andres Freund
• 23:29   Re: better atomics Tom Lane
• 23:32   Re: OSX doesn't accept identical source/target for strcpy() anymore Andres Freund
• 23:55   Re: better atomics Andres Freund