Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

23 December 2008

• 02:33   Re: contrib/pg_stat_statements 1212 Alex Hunsaker
• 02:44   Re: Lock conflict behavior? Jeff Davis
• 03:44   Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions Tom Lane
• 03:57   Re: encoding cleanups in cvs repo Tom Lane
• 04:30   Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery (v8) Fujii Masao
• 04:33   Re: Some semantic details of the window-function spec Tom Lane
• 04:42   Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions Emmanuel Cecchet
• 05:03   Re: Visibility map and freezing Fujii Masao
• 05:09   Re: Sync Rep: Second thoughts Emmanuel Cecchet
• 07:26   Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code Simon Riggs
• 07:26   Re: Hot standby and b-tree killed items Simon Riggs
• 07:26   Re: Hot standby and b-tree killed items Simon Riggs
• 07:56   Re: encoding cleanups in cvs repo Magnus Hagander
• 08:00   Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code Fujii Masao
• 08:23   Re: Proposed Patch to Improve Performance of Multi-Batch Hash Join for Skewed Data Sets Bryce Cutt
• 08:28   Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code Simon Riggs
• 08:45   Re: Lock conflict behavior? Tatsuo Ishii
• 08:54   Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery (v8) Simon Riggs
• 09:53   Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code Fujii Masao
• 10:01   Re: encoding cleanups in cvs repo Alvaro Herrera
• 10:05   Re: Some semantic details of the window-function spec Hitoshi Harada
• 10:24   Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code Pavan Deolasee
• 10:44   Re: PLUGINS Functionlity in Win32 build scripts MUHAMMAD ASIF
• 11:25   Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code Simon Riggs
• 11:53   Re: Hot standby and b-tree killed items Simon Riggs
• 12:06   Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code Pavan Deolasee
• 12:08   Re: Lock conflict behavior? Tatsuo Ishii
• 12:41   Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code Simon Riggs
• 12:48   Re: Lock conflict behavior? Tom Lane
• 13:12   Re: encoding cleanups in cvs repo Tom Lane
• 13:22   Re: Proposed Patch to Improve Performance of Multi-Batch Hash Join for Skewed Data Sets Robert Haas
• 13:32   Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code Fujii Masao
• 13:36   Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code Fujii Masao
• 13:51   Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions Kevin Grittner
• 13:52   Re: Proposed Patch to Improve Performance of Multi-Batch Hash Join for Skewed Data Sets Joshua Tolley
• 13:59   Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions Emmanuel Cecchet
• 14:14   Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions Kevin Grittner
• 14:15   Re: Proposed Patch to Improve Performance of Multi-Batch Hash Join for Skewed Data Sets Robert Haas
• 14:27   Re: encoding cleanups in cvs repo Alvaro Herrera
• 14:38   Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code Simon Riggs
• 14:48   Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions Heikki Linnakangas
• 14:49   Synchronous replication, reading WAL for sending Heikki Linnakangas
• 15:10   Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions Kevin Grittner
• 15:12   Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions Gregory Stark
• 15:28   Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions Kevin Grittner
• 15:32   Synchronous replication, network protocol Heikki Linnakangas
• 15:45   Re: [Fwd: Re: Transactions and temp tables] Heikki Linnakangas
• 15:49   Re: Synchronous replication, reading WAL for sending Simon Riggs
• 15:53   Re: Sync Rep: Second thoughts Markus Wanner
• 16:04   Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions Gregory Stark
• 16:09   Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code Mark Mielke
• 16:15   Re: Synchronous replication, network protocol Simon Riggs
• 16:15   Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions Stephan Szabo
• 16:23   Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code Fujii Masao
• 16:25   Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions Kevin Grittner
• 16:36   Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code Simon Riggs
• 16:51   Re: Synchronous replication, reading WAL for sending Fujii Masao
• 16:54   Re: Synchronous replication, network protocol Simon Riggs
• 16:58   Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions Kevin Grittner
• 17:12   Re: Proposed Patch to Improve Performance of Multi-BatchHash Join for Skewed Data Sets Lawrence, Ramon
• 17:40   Re: Lock conflict behavior? Jeff Davis
• 17:40   Re: Proposed Patch to Improve Performance of Multi-Batch Hash Join for Skewed Data Sets Joshua Tolley
• 17:42   Re: Synchronous replication, network protocol Fujii Masao
• 17:49   Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions Jeff Davis
• 18:32   Re: Visibility map and freezing Jeff Davis
• 19:46   Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions Robert Haas
• 19:55   Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions Simon Riggs
• 20:06   Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions Kevin Grittner
• 20:11   Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions Kevin Grittner
• 22:44   Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions Emmanuel Cecchet