On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 10:14:29AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> > It's equivalent to our assumption that distributions of values in
> > columns in the same table are independent. Making that assumption in
> > this case would probably result in occasional dramatic speed
> > improvements similar to the ones we've seen in less complex joins,
> > offset by just-as-occasional dramatic slowdowns of similar magnitude. In
> > other words, it will increase the variance of our results.
>
> Under what circumstances do you think that it would produce a dramatic
> slowdown? I'm confused. I thought the penalty for picking a bad set
> of values for the in-memory hash table was pretty small.
>
> ...Robert
I take that back :) I agree with what others have already said, that it
shouldn't cause dramatic slowdowns when we get it wrong.
- Josh
