Hi,
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 10:41 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> I'm happy if that whole feature is added. If we do add it, it will be a
> utility like "pg_resync". So in admin terms it will be almost identical
> to using rsync, just a specific version that minimizes effort even more
> than rsync does currently. The only difference as I see it would be some
> gain in performance, but we don't need to send the whole database down
> the wire again in either case.
I think that the type of your user is different from mine. If server fails
by simple termination of process, I don't want to spend 1min for
restarting other than catching up itself. For me, getting a fresh backup
(not only copying backup data but also checkpoint by pg_start_backup)
is expensive operation.
Of course, since I'm not planning to tackle that problem in 8.4,
I would not add "additional" synchronization point.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
