Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

30 August 2005

• 00:18   SHMMAX seems entirely broken in OS X 10.4.2 Tom Lane
• 00:19   lookup fail at DROP USER Jaime Casanova
• 00:26   Re: Performance gain from reduction of GROUP BY memory allocations Tom Lane
• 00:34   Re: SHMMAX seems entirely broken in OS X 10.4.2 Luke Lonergan
• 00:40   Re: lookup fail at DROP USER Alvaro Herrera
• 01:11   Re: lookup fail at DROP USER Tom Lane
• 01:22   Re: SHMMAX seems entirely broken in OS X 10.4.2 Joshua D. Drake
• 01:23   Re: lookup fail at DROP USER Tom Lane
• 01:41   Re: SHMMAX seems entirely broken in OS X 10.4.2 Tom Lane
• 02:22   Re: SHMMAX seems entirely broken in OS X 10.4.2 Jeff -
• 02:46   Re: SHMMAX seems entirely broken in OS X 10.4.2 Thomas F. O'Connell
• 03:13   Re: SHMMAX seems entirely broken in OS X 10.4.2 Luke Lonergan
• 03:37   Re: SHMMAX seems entirely broken in OS X 10.4.2 Tom Lane
• 03:52   Re: SHMMAX seems entirely broken in OS X 10.4.2 Thomas F. O'Connell
• 04:30   Intermittent stats test failures on buildfarm Tom Lane
• 04:37   Re: SHMMAX seems entirely broken in OS X 10.4.2 Tom Lane
• 06:43   Re: SHMMAX seems entirely broken in OS X 10.4.2 Luke Lonergan
• 07:38   Re: Performance gain from reduction of GROUP BY memory Simon Riggs
• 09:15   Re: Query Sampling Simon Riggs
• 09:26   Re: VACUUM/t_ctid bug (was Re: GiST concurrency commited) Teodor Sigaev
• 09:40   Re: Pre-allocated free space for row updating (like Simon Riggs
• 09:58   Re: VACUUM/t_ctid bug (was Re: GiST concurrency commited) Mario Weilguni
• 10:19   Re: VACUUM/t_ctid bug (was Re: GiST concurrency commited) Teodor Sigaev
• 10:51   Re: VACUUM/t_ctid bug (was Re: GiST concurrency commited) Mario Weilguni
• 11:26   Re: SHMMAX seems entirely broken in OS X 10.4.2 Dave Cramer
• 11:27   Re: dangling lock information? Hannu Krosing
• 11:32   Re: VACUUM/t_ctid bug (was Re: GiST concurrency commited) Teodor Sigaev
• 11:47   PG_DUMp esolsona@wurth.es
• 12:19   Re: Intermittent stats test failures on buildfarm Kris Jurka
• 12:25   Re: PG_DUMp Andrew Dunstan
• 12:28   Re: SHMMAX seems entirely broken in OS X 10.4.2 Jeff Trout
• 12:46   Re: [Slony1-general] Re: dangling lock information? David Parker
• 13:20   Re: ALTER TABLE ( smallinto -> boolean ) ... Greg Stark
• 13:51   Re: Intermittent stats test failures on buildfarm Tom Lane
• 13:55   Re: VACUUM/t_ctid bug (was Re: GiST concurrency commited) Tom Lane
• 14:23   Re: Performance gain from reduction of GROUP BY memory Bruce Momjian
• 14:27   Re: 8.1beta, SunOS and shmget Thomas F. O'Connell
• 14:39   Re: Performance gain from reduction of GROUP BY memory Alvaro Herrera
• 14:43   Re: Performance gain from reduction of GROUP BY memory Bruce Momjian
• 14:52   Re: Performance gain from reduction of GROUP BY memory Tom Lane
• 15:46   Re: SHMMAX seems entirely broken in OS X 10.4.2 Luke Lonergan
• 17:04   Re: [Slony1-general] Re: dangling lock information? Chris Browne
• 17:12   Re: 8.1beta, SunOS and shmget Tom Lane
• 18:09   Re: [Slony1-general] Re: dangling lock information? Tom Lane
• 18:09   problems installing pgsql Ricardo Gamero
• 18:13   Re: [Slony1-general] Re: dangling lock information? Alvaro Herrera
• 18:55   Re: [Slony1-general] Re: dangling lock information? Neil Conway
• 19:56   Re: Intermittent stats test failures on buildfarm Rocco Altier
• 20:36   Re: Intermittent stats test failures on buildfarm Tom Lane
• 21:36   Re: [Slony1-general] Re: dangling lock information? Andreas Pflug
• 22:12   Re: problems installing pgsql on rh9 box Jeff MacDonald
• 23:04   Re: [Slony1-general] Re: dangling lock information? Chris Browne
• 23:35   Re: Pre-allocated free space for row updating (like PCTFREE) Satoshi Nagayasu