Re: SHMMAX seems entirely broken in OS X 10.4.2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Trout
Subject Re: SHMMAX seems entirely broken in OS X 10.4.2
Date
Msg-id 732F80DB-AF44-4FDD-B013-66C9CC3975AA@torgo.978.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SHMMAX seems entirely broken in OS X 10.4.2  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: SHMMAX seems entirely broken in OS X 10.4.2  ("Luke Lonergan" <llonergan@greenplum.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Aug 30, 2005, at 12:37 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

>
> Did that.  Set shmall first, shmall second, both together in one  
> sysctl
> command; no joy anywhere.  Are you trying this on fully up-to-date
> Tiger?
>

Just ran software update and (besides a couple apps) it had a  
security update.

skittlebrau:~ postgres$ grep shm /etc/rc
# sysctl -w kern.sysv.shmmax=4194305 kern.sysv.shmmin=1  
kern.sysv.shmmni=32 kern.sysv.shmseg=8 kern.sysv.shmall=1024
sysctl -w kern.sysv.shmmax=335544320
sysctl -w kern.sysv.shmmin=1
sysctl -w kern.sysv.shmmni=32
sysctl -w kern.sysv.shmseg=16
sysctl -w kern.sysv.shmall=327680

skittlebrau:~ postgres$ sysctl -a | grep shm
kern.sysv.shmmax: 335544320
kern.sysv.shmmin: 1
kern.sysv.shmmni: 32
kern.sysv.shmseg: 16
kern.sysv.shmall: 327680

good luck.

--
Jeff Trout <jeff@jefftrout.com>
http://www.jefftrout.com/
http://www.stuarthamm.net/




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: PG_DUMp
Next
From: "David Parker"
Date:
Subject: Re: [Slony1-general] Re: dangling lock information?