Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

23 June 2005

• 00:14   COPY FROM performance improvements Alon Goldshuv
• 01:09   GiST rtree logic is not right Tom Lane
• 02:17   Re: commit_delay, siblings Qingqing Zhou
• 02:57   Re: commit_delay, siblings Tom Lane
• 03:14   Re: [PATCHES] O_DIRECT for WAL writes Curt Sampson
• 03:52   Re: [PATCHES] O_DIRECT for WAL writes Tom Lane
• 03:54   Re: [PATCHES] O_DIRECT for WAL writes Curt Sampson
• 04:00   Re: [PATCHES] O_DIRECT for WAL writes Tom Lane
• 04:07   HaveNFreeProcs ? Alvaro Herrera
• 04:12   Re: [PATCHES] O_DIRECT for WAL writes Gavin Sherry
• 04:18   Re: HaveNFreeProcs ? Tom Lane
• 04:22   Re: HaveNFreeProcs ? Tom Lane
• 04:25   Re: [PATCHES] O_DIRECT for WAL writes Gregory Maxwell
• 04:33   Re: [PATCHES] O_DIRECT for WAL writes Tom Lane
• 04:44   Re: HaveNFreeProcs ? Tom Lane
• 04:50   Re: [PATCHES] O_DIRECT for WAL writes Gavin Sherry
• 05:05   Re: [PATCHES] O_DIRECT for WAL writes Curt Sampson
• 06:20   Re: GiST rtree logic is not right Teodor Sigaev
• 06:31   Re: GiST rtree logic is not right John Hansen
• 07:05   Re: GiST rtree logic is not right Oleg Bartunov
• 08:13   Re: commit_delay, siblings Qingqing Zhou
• 08:13   Re: Strange logic for partial index proving laser
• 10:22   Re: Strange logic for partial index proving Richard Huxton
• 12:08   Re: HOOKS for Synchronous Replication Neil Conway
• 12:42   HEAD initdb failing on OSX Dave Cramer
• 14:04   Re: GiST rtree logic is not right Tom Lane
• 14:08   Re: GiST rtree logic is not right Tom Lane
• 14:33   Re: HEAD initdb failing on OSX, update Dave Cramer
• 14:37   PL/pgSQL Debugger Support Denis Lussier
• 14:46   Re: HEAD initdb failing on OSX, addendum Dave Cramer
• 14:48   Re: Strange logic for partial index proving Tom Lane
• 14:49   Re: HEAD initdb failing on OSX Tom Lane
• 14:55   Re: Strange logic for partial index proving Richard Huxton
• 15:09   regression failure Andrew Dunstan
• 15:15   Re: PL/pgSQL Debugger Support Tom Lane
• 15:29   Re: HEAD initdb failing on OSX Dave Cramer
• 15:32   Re: HEAD initdb failing on OSX Tom Lane
• 15:37   Re: regression failure Tom Lane
• 15:46   Re: regression failure Alvaro Herrera
• 15:55   Re: Strange logic for partial index proving Bruno Wolff III
• 16:39   Re: [GENERAL] plpgsql constraint checked data fails to restore Jan Wieck
• 16:57   Re: The contrib hit list Euler Taveira de Oliveira
• 17:06   Re: [GENERAL] [PATCHES] Removing Kerberos 4 Jim C. Nasby
• 17:07   Re: The contrib hit list Tom Lane
• 17:11   Re: pl/pgsql: END verbosity Jan Wieck
• 17:16   Re: [PATCHES] O_DIRECT for WAL writes Jim C. Nasby
• 17:31   Re: [GENERAL] plpgsql constraint checked data fails to restore Tom Lane
• 17:34   Re: [GENERAL] [PATCHES] Removing Kerberos 4 Magnus Hagander
• 17:40   Re: PL/pgSQL Debugger Support Matthew T. O'Connor
• 17:54   Re: PL/pgSQL Debugger Support Alvaro Herrera
• 17:56   Re: regression failure Andrew Dunstan
• 18:07   Re: PL/pgSQL Debugger Support Jonah H. Harris
• 18:08   Re: regression failure Tom Lane
• 18:19   Re: [PATCHES] O_DIRECT for WAL writes Douglas McNaught
• 18:21   Re: PL/pgSQL Debugger Support Josh Berkus
• 18:32   Re: regression failure Andrew Dunstan
• 21:04   Re: regression failure Andrew Dunstan
• 21:59   Fixing r-tree semantics Tom Lane
• 22:53   Re: Fixing r-tree semantics Andrew - Supernews
• 22:54   Re: Fixing r-tree semantics Michael Fuhr
• 23:01   Re: GiST rtree logic is not right Greg Stark
• 23:38   Re: Fixing r-tree semantics Tom Lane