Alvaro,
I agree, a protocol seems to generally be the best option.
-Jonah
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 01:40:18PM -0400, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
>
>
>>Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Denis Lussier <denisl@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>I got to thinking it'd be kewl if PgAdmin3 supported an interactive
>>>>debugger for pl/pgsql.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>That's been kicked around before, although I don't think anyone wants to
>>>tie it to pgAdmin specifically. Check the archives...
>>>
>>>
>>I didn't find anything relevant after a quick search, but if memory
>>serves, one of the objections to PgAdmin was that it was windows only.
>>This of course is no longer true as of PgAdmin III 1.0. It now support
>>Win32, Linux and FreeBSD. So perhaps that objection is no longer valid.
>>
>>
>
>I think the point is that we will have to make some modifications to
>PL/pgSQL, so why not make sure we write something that any tool can use?
>Say, a well-defined BE/FE protocol extension.
>
>
>
