Re: HaveNFreeProcs ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: HaveNFreeProcs ?
Date
Msg-id 914.1119501865@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: HaveNFreeProcs ?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: HaveNFreeProcs ?
List pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> ... because it's written to not loop more than
> superuser_reserved_connections times, and it's hard to imagine anyone
> would set that to more than half a dozen or so.

We could help keep people on the correct path if guc.c enforced a sane
upper limit on superuser_reserved_connections.  I'm thinking somewhere
around 10.

Any thoughts about that?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] O_DIRECT for WAL writes
Next
From: Gavin Sherry
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] O_DIRECT for WAL writes