On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 12:44:25AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> > ... because it's written to not loop more than
> > superuser_reserved_connections times, and it's hard to imagine anyone
> > would set that to more than half a dozen or so.
>
> We could help keep people on the correct path if guc.c enforced a sane
> upper limit on superuser_reserved_connections. I'm thinking somewhere
> around 10.
>
> Any thoughts about that?
Maybe a warning in the docs and the sample/default config file would be
better. It seems silly to limit this just because it might cause a
performance problem (this is just a performance issue, right?)
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel@decibel.org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
