Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

17 October 2004

• 00:22   win32 pg_autovacuum make error Andrew Dunstan
• 00:38   Re: win32 pg_autovacuum make error Magnus Hagander
• 00:52   Re: win32 pg_autovacuum make error Tom Lane
• 01:16   Re: Getting rid of AtEOXact_Buffers (was Re: [Testperf-general] Re: [PERFORM] First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ...) Josh Berkus
• 01:19   Re: Getting rid of AtEOXact_Buffers (was Re: [Testperf-general] Re: [PERFORM] First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ...) Tom Lane
• 01:32   Re: Nearing final release? Dave Page
• 01:35   Re: Getting rid of AtEOXact_Buffers (was Re: [Testperf-general] Re: [PERFORM] First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ...) Josh Berkus
• 01:43   Re: Nearing final release? Greg Stark
• 01:56   Re: win32 pg_autovacuum make error Matthew T. O'Connor
• 02:23   Re: win32 pg_autovacuum make error Tom Lane
• 02:41   Re: Nearing final release? Tom Lane
• 03:05   Re: Nearing final release? Dann Corbit
• 04:23   Re: Nearing final release? Sean Chittenden
• 04:29   Re: Nearing final release? Bruce Momjian
• 04:31   Re: Nearing final release? Bruce Momjian
• 09:11   Re: Nearing final release? Greg Stark
• 16:22   additional GCC warnings Neil Conway
• 16:26   Re: 7.4 changes Andrew Dunstan
• 17:09   Re: 7.4 changes Andrew Dunstan
• 17:17   spinlocks: generalizing "non-locking test" Neil Conway
• 21:19   Re: Nearing final release? Tom Lane
• 21:51   Re: additional GCC warnings Tom Lane
• 21:52   Re: 7.4 changes Tom Lane
• 22:14   Re: spinlocks: generalizing "non-locking test" Tom Lane
• 23:07   Open Items Bruce Momjian
• 23:35   strange result from contrib/seg regression on windows Andrew Dunstan
• 23:42   Re: [HACKERS] Getting rid of AtEOXact Buffers (was Re: [Testperf-general] Re: First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ...) 
• 23:49   Re: strange result from contrib/seg regression on windows Tom Lane