Re: Re: [HACKERS] Getting rid of AtEOXact Buffers (was Re: [Testperf-general] Re: First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ...) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Re: [HACKERS] Getting rid of AtEOXact Buffers (was Re: [Testperf-general] Re: First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ...)
Date
Msg-id 10584.1098043955@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Getting rid of AtEOXact Buffers (was Re: [Testperf-general] Re: First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ...)  (<simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
<simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> If the resource owner is always responsible for releasing locked
> buffers, who releases the locks if the backend crashes?

The ensuing system reset takes care of that.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: strange result from contrib/seg regression on windows
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Open Items