Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

26 September 2000

• 07:09   Case sensitive field names Jarmo Paavilainen
• 08:25   pgsql is 75 times faster with my new index scan devik@cdi.cz
• 09:22   Re: pgsql is 75 times faster with my new index scan Alfred Perlstein
• 09:33   Re: pgsql is 75 times faster with my new index scan Hannu Krosing
• 09:46   Re: pgsql is 75 times faster with my new index scan Philip Warner
• 09:58   Re: pgsql is 75 times faster with my new index scan Hiroshi Inoue
• 10:40   Re: Case sensitive field names Hannu Krosing
• 13:49   New mod_php3 RPMs for Mandrake Thomas Lockhart
• 13:54   Reimplementing permission checks for rules Tom Lane
• 14:12   Re: Reimplementing permission checks for rules Philip Warner
• 14:15   Re: pgsql is 75 times faster with my new index scan devik@cdi.cz
• 14:15   Re: pgsql is 75 times faster with my new index scan devik@cdi.cz
• 15:50   Re: [BUGS] 7.0.2 source rpm failed to compile Thomas Lockhart
• 15:54   PostgreSQL 7.0.3? G. Anthony Reina
• 16:23   SV: Case sensitive field names Jarmo Paavilainen
• 16:48   Re: PostgreSQL 7.0.3? The Hermit Hacker
• 17:07   Damn, pg_proc index corrupted, can't find anythign on REINDEX ... The Hermit Hacker
• 17:10   Re: [BUGS] 7.0.2 source rpm failed to compile Lamar Owen
• 18:19   RE: pgsql is 75 times faster with my new index scan Mikheev, Vadim
• 18:21   RE: pgsql is 75 times faster with my new index scan Mikheev, Vadim
• 18:26   RE: pgsql is 75 times faster with my new index scan Mikheev, Vadim
• 18:33   RE: Damn, pg_proc index corrupted, can't find anythign on REINDEX ... Mikheev, Vadim
• 19:12   RE: Damn, pg_proc index corrupted, can't find anythign on REINDEX ... Hiroshi Inoue
• 19:24   ordbms - postgresql errata Jeff MacDonald
• 19:39   RE: Damn, pg_proc index corrupted, can't find anythign on REINDEX ... The Hermit Hacker
• 19:49   Re: 7.0.2 crash, backtrace with debug available Alfred Perlstein
• 19:53   Re: Damn, pg_proc index corrupted, can't find anythign on REINDEX ... Tom Lane
• 20:08   Re: Damn, pg_proc index corrupted, can't find anythign on REINDEX ... The Hermit Hacker
• 21:18   RE: [GENERAL] update inside transaction violates unique constrain t? Mikheev, Vadim
• 21:58   Re: SV: Case sensitive field names Hannu Krosing
• 22:02   Re: RE: [GENERAL] update inside transaction violates unique constraint? Hannu Krosing
• 22:06   use of / in ~ vs. ~* Hannu Krosing
• 22:17   RE: RE: [GENERAL] update inside transaction violates un ique constraint? Mikheev, Vadim
• 23:06   Re: use of / in ~ vs. ~* Tom Lane
• 23:36   RE: RE: [GENERAL] update inside transaction violates un ique constraint? Mikheev, Vadim
• 23:41   libpq static link library dowsn't work (M$ VS6) Finn Kettner