On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Fujii Masao wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 2:22 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Can someone explain to me in plain language what problem this is
>>> trying to fix? I'm having trouble figuring it out.
>>
>> The problem is that pg_xlogfile_name(pg_last_xlog_receive_location()) and
>> pg_xlogfile_name(pg_last_xlog_replay_location()) might report an inaccurate
>> WAL file name because currently pg_xlogfile_name() always uses the current
>> timeline to calculate the WAL file name. For example, even though the last
>> applied WAL file is 000000010000000000000002, the standby wrongly reports
>> that 000000000000000000000002 has been applied last.
>
> Should we throw an error in pg_xlogfile_name() if called during
> recovery? It's not doing anything useful as it is.
I have no objection for now.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
