On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> Here's the fine patch. The actual code changes are simple and seem to
>> work as expected, but I struggled a bit with the phrasing of the
>> messages. Feel free to suggest improvements.
>
> Stick with the original wording? I don't really see a need to change it.
How about?:
if ((!am_superuser || am_walsender) &&ReservedBackends > 0 &&!HaveNFreeProcs(ReservedBackends))
{if (am_walsender) ereport(FATAL, (errcode(ERRCODE_TOO_MANY_CONNECTIONS), errmsg("remaining
connectionslots are reserved for
non-replication superuser connections")));else ereport(FATAL, (errcode(ERRCODE_TOO_MANY_CONNECTIONS),
errmsg("connectionlimit exceeded for non-superusers")));
}
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
