On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> One possible thing we might do (bearing in mind that we might need to
>> wall off access at multiple levels) would be to forbid creating a
>> relcache entry for a non-local temprel. That would, in turn, forbid
>> doing pretty much anything to such a relation, although I'm not sure
>> what else would get broken in the process.
>
> Dropping temprels left behind by a crashed backend would get broken by
> that; which is a deal-breaker, because we have to be able to clean those
> up.
Phooey. It was such a good idea in my head.
...Robert
