Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
Date
Msg-id 21996.1273013613@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
List pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> Given your clarification on the whole set of behaviors, I'm highly
> dubious about the idea of implementing Tom's proposal when we're already
> Beta 1.  It seems like a 9.1 thing.

I think you missed the point: "do nothing" is not a viable option.
I was proposing something that seemed simple enough to be safe to
drop into 9.0 at this point.  I'm less convinced that what Simon
is proposing is safe enough.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: including PID or backend ID in relpath of temp rels
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful