Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
Date
Msg-id 1273014360.4535.3069.camel@ebony
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 18:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

> I think you missed the point: "do nothing" is not a viable option.
> I was proposing something that seemed simple enough to be safe to
> drop into 9.0 at this point. 

I've posted a patch that meets your stated objections. If you could
review that, this could be done in an hour.

There are other ways, but you'll need to explain a proposal in enough
detail that we're clear what you actually mean. 

> I'm less convinced that what Simon is proposing is safe enough.

Which proposal?

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
Next
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful