On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I'm thinking there isn't anything much we can do here without using a
> different message wording for a match to a REJECT entry. So it's a
> straight-up tradeoff of possible security information leakage against
> whether a different wording is really helpful to the admin. Both of
> those seem like fairly marginal concerns, really, so I'm having a hard
> time deciding which one ought to win. But given that nobody complained
> before this, is it worth changing?
What's wrong with something like "connection not permitted" or
"connection not authorized"?
...Robert
