Re: Thoughts on pg_hba.conf rejection - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Thoughts on pg_hba.conf rejection
Date
Msg-id 19107.1271291275@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Thoughts on pg_hba.conf rejection  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Thoughts on pg_hba.conf rejection  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> What's wrong with something like "connection not permitted" or
> "connection not authorized"?

The case that we're trying to cater to with the existing wording is
novice DBAs, who are likely to stare at such a message and not even
realize that pg_hba.conf is what they need to change.  Frankly, by
the time anyone is using REJECT entries they are probably advanced
enough to not need much help from the error message; but what you
propose is an absolute lock to increase the number of newbie questions
on the lists by a large factor.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Thoughts on pg_hba.conf rejection
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: a faster compression algorithm for pg_dump