Re: Why so much time difference with a same query/plan? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Karl Vogel
Subject Re: Why so much time difference with a same query/plan?
Date
Msg-id m3y8flkzs8.fsf@telenet.be
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why so much time difference with a same query/plan?  (Yann Michel <yann-postgresql@spline.de>)
Responses Re: Why so much time difference with a same query/plan?  (Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>)
List pgsql-performance
Yann Michel <yann-postgresql@spline.de> writes:

> On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 01:52:40PM -0800, Litao Wu wrote:
>> Does the order of columns in the index matter since
>> more than 50% customer_id = 158?
>>
>> I think it does not in Oracle.
>>
>> Will the performance be better if I change index
>> xxx_idx to ("domain", customer_id, created)?
>
> Well, in Oracle this would of cause matter. Oracle calculates index
> usage by being able to fill all index's attributes from the left to the
> right. If any one attribute within is missing Oracle would not test if
> it is only one attribute missing, or if all other attributes are missing
> within the query's where clause.

This depends on the version of Oracle you're using. Oracle 9i
introduced Index Skip Scans:

 http://www.oracle.com/technology//products/oracle9i/daily/apr22.html

I don't know whether pg has something similar?

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Cosimo Streppone
Date:
Subject: Re: Howto Increased performace ?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: sudden drop in statement turnaround latency -- yay!.