Re: pg_dump / pg_dumpall / memory issues - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Doug McNaught
Subject Re: pg_dump / pg_dumpall / memory issues
Date
Msg-id m3wui2gvzq.fsf@varsoon.wireboard.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump / pg_dumpall / memory issues  ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>)
Responses Re: pg_dump / pg_dumpall / memory issues  (Dennis Gearon <gearond@cvc.net>)
List pgsql-general
Kyle <kyle@ccidomain.com> writes:

> Shridhar has a good point using nice.  I know RedHat supports nice
> because I have installed a totally background program that uses "nice
> 19" as part of its command line.

He's talking about honoring 'nice' for I/O scheduling, which is
in addition to the standard modification of CPU priority.  Linux
doesn't currently do this in 2.4--it was discussed for 2.5 but I don't
know if it has gone in yet.

-Doug

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Amir Becher
Date:
Subject: Corrupt index
Next
From: Guy Fraser
Date:
Subject: Re: Arrays ... need clarification....