inoue@tpf.co.jp (Hiroshi Inoue) writes:
> Randy Yates wrote:
>> Tim.Clarke@manifest.co.uk ("Tim Clarke") writes:
>>
>>>Whenever I get these I write a tiny "stuff one record in and tell me if
>>>it errors" iteration. Just leave that running and get on with something
>>>else productive.
>> I think the point is, if the driver error messages were a little more
>> intelligent (including some context) to begin with, then you (and a
>> bazillion others) wouldn't have to take any extra time to begin
>> with. It would be an instant "Oh, I see the problem."
>
> As far as I see, it's MS-Access not the ODBC driver which rsports the
> *Overflows*.
How can you tell?
>> It might also be helpful if the driver converted all records it was
>> able to convert and not simply abort on the first record with an
>> error.
>
> Unfortunately the ODBC driver itself doesn't detect any error before
> MS-Access calls SQLEndTran.
I don't understand your statements. Is it not the driver that is performing
the conversions?
If it is MS, then of course that explains everything ...
--
% Randy Yates % "Bird, on the wing,
%% Fuquay-Varina, NC % goes floating by
%%% 919-577-9882 % but there's a teardrop in his eye..."
%%%% <yates@ieee.org> % 'One Summer Dream', *Face The Music*, ELO
http://home.earthlink.net/~yatescr