Clinging to sanity, chris@metatrontech.com (Chris Travers) mumbled into her beard:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>But many feel Slony is far better than previous solutions and should be
>>touted as we have touted other replication solutions in the past.
> Any chance that Slony will be packaged in the contrib directory? Or
> is the time for that past? After all, in 7.4, iirc. we still had
> things like rserv and other things which probably don't even work
> with 7.4.
There are two excellent reasons not to:
1. Slony-I is intended to be able to be "plugged" into several
different versions of PostgreSQL. Putting it in contrib would
somewhat injure that.
2. Peter Eisentraut and Fabien Coelho have been working on "pgxs"
which is designed to allow contrib to be essentially eliminated.
The goal is not to increase the amount of stuff in contrib; it
is to _eliminate_ contrib.
That goes along with pgxs making it easy to have a large number
of projects on GBorg/PGFoundry that can be easily added to a
PostgreSQL install.
--
select 'cbbrowne' || '@' || 'acm.org';
http://www3.sympatico.ca/cbbrowne/languages.html
"Listen, strange women, lyin' in ponds, distributin' swords, is no
basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives
itself from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic
ceremony." -- Monty Python and the Holy Grail
