After a long battle with technology, dan@langille.org ("Dan Langille"), an earthling, wrote:
> I have no problem directing people to the right tool for the job.
> Sometimes that tool is PostgreSQL. Sometimes it is not. PostgreSQL
> cannot please everyone all the time.
It may well be a mistake to try to please all the people all the
time. I think that was exactly what Tom Christiansen had in mind when
he wrote:
"Huh? Windows was designed to keep the idiots away from Unix so we
could hack in peace. Let's not break that." -- Tom Christiansen
Microsoft tries to market Windows as being "all things for all
people;" much of its badness comes from that.
"If Ada became the hot, in-language you would see a lot more bad
code in Ada." -- Thaddeus L. Olczyk <olczyk@interaccess.com>,
comp.lang.C++
If PostgreSQL became as popular as MS-Access, we'd find people doing
hideous things with it. (Or, to be more precise, doing _even more
hideous_ things ;-).)
--
output = ("cbbrowne" "@" "ntlug.org")
http://www3.sympatico.ca/cbbrowne/emacs.html "Is your pencil Y2K
certified? Do you know the possible effects if it isn't?"
