Re: Differentiating different Open Source databases - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Dimitri Fontaine
Subject Re: Differentiating different Open Source databases
Date
Msg-id m2oc33ot2d.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr
Whole thread Raw
In response to Differentiating different Open Source databases  ("Nasby, Jim" <JNasby@enovafinancial.com>)
Responses Re: Differentiating different Open Source databases  (Rob Wultsch <wultsch@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-advocacy
"Nasby, Jim" <JNasby@enovafinancial.com> writes:
> An opinion I often run across when talking to database people who haven't
> dealt with Postgres is "open source databases aren't very good". In all

Well I'm not sure how closely related/relevant it is, but I find more
and more people thinking they should take the NoSQL pill because frankly
you only get so far with Oracle and MySQL.

They should also hear the message that PostgreSQL is quite another
beast, and its role into your software architecture can be very
different from those first two.  Because of technical facts and also
licencing policies, of course.

Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Gevik Babakhani
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Magazine #00 is out ! Send feedback please !
Next
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: directory of pg freelancers