Re: Any reasons to not move pgstattuple to core? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dimitri Fontaine
Subject Re: Any reasons to not move pgstattuple to core?
Date
Msg-id m2li22bkuj.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Any reasons to not move pgstattuple to core?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Any reasons to not move pgstattuple to core?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> I think we were going to try to group the extensions into categories
> (debugging tools, demonstration code, data types, etc.) and maybe
> encourage packagers to put the debugging tools in the same OS package
> as the core server.  But Tom was not supportive, and he was at the
> time the packager for Red Hat, so it didn't seem like we were going to
> get to far with it.

My understanding is that we wanted to promote some extensions as being
"core extensions" and change the directory and documentation layout to
encourage packagers to rethink they work.

And my understanding of Tom's reaction is that he didn't believe the
source directory layout has anything to do with the packaging problem,
we should just document the extensions we want installed by default and
packagers will know to follow us there.

Still, *something* needs to be done here.

Regards,
-- 
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch: FORCE_NULL option for copy COPY in CSV mode
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: WITHIN GROUP patch