Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance
Date
Msg-id m2j3f0b79eb1004120206i3de076f7j5efcdabcb353c73b@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance  ("Erik Rijkers" <er@xs4all.nl>)
Responses Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> I understand that in the scale=1000 case, there is a huge
> cache effect, but why doesn't that apply to the pgbench runs
> against the standby?  (and for the scale=10_000 case the
> differences are still rather large)

I guess that this performance degradation happened because a number of
buffer replacements caused UpdateMinRecoveryPoint() often. So I think
increasing shared_buffers would improve the performance significantly.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Boszormenyi Zoltan
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_ctl stop -m immediate on the primary server inflates sequences
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Streaming replication and a disk full in primary