Using 9.0devel cvs HEAD, 2010.04.08.
I am trying to understand the performance difference
between primary and standby under a standard pgbench
read-only test.
server has 32 GB, 2 quadcores.
primary: tps = 34606.747930 (including connections establishing) tps = 34527.078068 (including connections
establishing)tps = 34654.297319 (including connections establishing)
standby: tps = 700.346283 (including connections establishing) tps = 717.576886 (including connections establishing)
tps= 740.522472 (including connections establishing)
transaction type: SELECT only
scaling factor: 1000
query mode: simple
number of clients: 20
number of threads: 1
duration: 900 s
both instances have max_connections = 100 shared_buffers = 256MB checkpoint_segments = 50 effective_cache_size= 16GB
See also:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-testers/2010-04/msg00005.php (differences with scale 10_000)
I understand that in the scale=1000 case, there is a huge
cache effect, but why doesn't that apply to the pgbench runs
against the standby? (and for the scale=10_000 case the
differences are still rather large)
Maybe these differences are as expected. I don't find
any explanation in the documentation.
thanks,
Erik Rijkers
