Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>> That's not exactly what happens here. There would be no "support"
>> version alias in the control file, so no way to upgrade to it, and
>> "support" would happen to be what ALTER EXTENSION foo UPDATE would
>> consider when you don't mention explicitly the target version.
>
>> However, when you do say that you want to upgrade to '2.0' or to
>> 'stable', now the upgrade script certainly exists and the version alias
>> too, so that the upgrade is possible. Only explicitly though.
>
> Hmm. To make that work, we'd have to have ALTER EXTENSION UPDATE use a
> different default version name from what CREATE EXTENSION uses (unless
Yes. I see that as a good feature to have. stable and support looks
like good default aliases for me, but again, IANANS (native speaker).
> you're willing to also break use of CREATE EXTENSION without an explicit
> target version). I was intending to have "default_version" identify the
> default target for both cases. While we could have different parameters
> for the two cases, I think it would mostly just cause confusion.
I happen to think it would avoid too much confusion myself. There's a
semantic difference here, that's not just playing with keywords. And
we're adding nice error checks to help stay on the safe side.
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
